ای آر پایانامه

 

مقاله The Role of Human structure in Disaster The evaluation of empowerment education of the people (MOHEB project word دارای 1 صفحه می باشد و دارای تنظیمات در microsoft word می باشد و آماده پرینت یا چاپ است

فایل ورد مقاله The Role of Human structure in Disaster The evaluation of empowerment education of the people (MOHEB project word کاملا فرمت بندی و تنظیم شده در استاندارد دانشگاه و مراکز دولتی می باشد.

این پروژه توسط مرکز مرکز پروژه های دانشجویی آماده و تنظیم شده است

توجه : در صورت  مشاهده  بهم ریختگی احتمالی در متون زیر ،دلیل ان کپی کردن این مطالب از داخل فایل ورد می باشد و در فایل اصلی مقاله The Role of Human structure in Disaster The evaluation of empowerment education of the people (MOHEB project word ،به هیچ وجه بهم ریختگی وجود ندارد

---

بخشی از متن مقاله The Role of Human structure in Disaster The evaluation of empowerment education of the people (MOHEB project word :

سال انتشار: 1391
محل انتشار: چهارمین کنفرانس بین المللی مقاوم سازی
تعداد صفحات: 1
چکیده:

This evaluation has been done in the Golestan province (one of the provinces that MOHEB project has been established) in the purpose to the answering to these questions:1- Whether the scenarios were efficient for empowering of people against disaster 2- Whether the education plans were suitable for the people3- Whether the applied methods were effective 4- Whether the learning subjects were effective The method of Kirk Patrick evaluation has been used. The result of the firs level of Kirk Patrick’s evaluation was: the primary reaction of the participants to the learning situation and methods of learning was overall good. – The satisfaction of the time of the session was measured 40% – The satisfaction of the place of the session was measured 30%- The satisfaction of the discipline of the session was measured 29% – The satisfaction of the participants for the method of the teaching was measured 63%- The assessment of the participants about the academic level of educators was appropriate (86%)- About one out three of participants was unsatisfied due to level of participation. – Overall satisfaction of the session was 42% and only 23%were unsatisfied. Assessment of the firs level, demonstrated that: 1- The learning themes and the behavior of educators was accepted by participants but the satisfaction would become higher if the educators applied more various methods especially social learning models 2- The score of the evaluation would be higher, if local informants’ participation and need assessment for time and place of the session was done.

 

 

کلمات کلیدی :